Report card
About this pilot report card
The Waikato River Authority Report Card summarises where we are on the journey towards meeting the aspirational objectives of the Vision and Strategy, Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato.
Report cards are gaining popularity internationally as a communication tool because they:
- Use a simple, familiar format
- Synthesise complex information into simple key messages for a broad audience
- Engage the community and provide accountability for environmental management and restoration actions
What it does
Analysis
Builds on the analysis in the Waikato River Independent Scoping Study.
Guide
Framework was guided by an advisory roopu comprising Waikato River iwi. Waikato River iwi cultural values underpin the Report Card framework.
Structure
Is structured around eight taura (strands of a rope) that together capture aspirations of the Vision and Strategy (Te Ture Whaimana) for restoration of the health and wellbeing of the river and its people.
Support
Each taura essentially equates to a high-level or “mega-value set” such as kai that supports cultural, recreational and commercial harvest. Each taura is then broken down into smaller strands or value sub-sets; for example, koura and tuna. Below this level are a number of indicators that, in combination, can be used to describe the state of each value sub-set.
Information
This version of the Report Card has been populated using available information (e.g., regional council programmes) and the best professional judgement of personnel who have worked in the catchment for many years (including Waikato Regional Council, Fish & Game and NIWA)
Report Card Date
At the time of populating the Report Card, primarily with 2012-2014 data, not all indicator information was available.
Process
Processes and underlying data that underpin the on-going development of the Report Card have been documented to allow deeper investigation and support future report card updates (anticipated to be five-yearly)
Vision
Developed by
This Report Card was developed by NIWA, Diffuse Sources Ltd., and The Waikato Raupatu River Trust.
Acknowledgements
Information for the Report Card was obtained either directly or indirectly from the following organisations:
And the Report Card Roopu involves representatives from Te Arawa, Tūwharetoa, Raukawa, Waikato-Tainui and Maniapoto. We have endeavoured to use the information appropriately and take responsibility for the scores derived.
Indicators
A
B
C
D
Overall Grade
Click or tap on a letter to reveal the Taura it represents.
Kai
Kai are healthy, and have a strong whakapapa, are safe to eat, locally abundant and can be harvested according to our traditional practices.
1 of 9 B+Economy
Communities are prosperous, as shown by high levels of employment, housing affordability, gross domestic product and income equality.
2 of 9 *Sites of Significance
Our sites of significance are forever recognised and celebrated as areas of historical and cultural importance and safe for us to interact with and support a healthy Awa.
Due to a lack of finer-scale information, there was insufficient information to score Sites of Significance.
3 of 9 CExperience
We have a flourishing and nurturing connection with the rivers and we are empowered to pursue and maintain our interaction.
4 of 9 CWater Security
Our land use practices and land development support communities and taonga species having access to life-sustaining supplies of water.
5 of 9 C+Ecological Integrity
Aquatic life has access to healthy habitats protected from adverse effects due to land use and contaminants. Aquatic life has access to healthy habitats protected from adverse effects due to land use.
6 of 9 CEffort
Communities, businesses and individuals are engaged in comprehensive contaminant control and rehabilitation to achieve the Vision and Strategy.
7 of 9 C-Water Quality
Land use and development practices support water bodies that have water that is safe to physically interact with.
8 of 9 C+Overall Grade
As of 2016, the overall grade is C+, as only some of the Vision & Strategy aspirations for the Waikato River are being met.
9 of 9Lakes location and sub-catchment report card
Click or tap on the label for each sub-catchment to reveal its report card score. Click on the blue markers on the map for information on lakes in that location.



Shallow riverine lakes have algal blooms, very poor clarity, pest fish, have lost submerged plants, and kai species are degraded. Rehabilitation plans initiated.
1 of 9
Lake Rotoroa’s ecological integrity and water quality have degraded.
2 of 9




The water clarity degrades swimming all year, but bug-level safe in the bathing season; diverse native fish (whitebait & eel fishing), but pest fish are prevalent; extensive drainage and flood control degrade ecological integrity; large wetlands present.
5 of 9 Waipā

Water quality and clarity are unsafe for swimming in the mainstem and many tributaries; many lakes have good access and riparian vegetation but low water quality; diverse kai species in tributaries.
6 of 9 Mid Waikato

Water quality is safe for swimming only in the mainstem in bathing season; macroinvertebrate indicators reflect degraded conditions; good access and signage on mainstem and lake, efforts underway to improve fish passage.
7 of 9 Ohakuri To Karapiro

Water quality is safe for swimming in the mainstem but not in most tributaries; six hydrolakes with good access support recreation; cumulative effects of farm inputs are increasing; a high degree of groundwater allocation; eels are manually transferred from below Karapiro; a high level of riparian fencing on dairy farms.
8 of 9 Huka To Ohakuri

Water quality is safe for swimming and good for trout fishing; geothermal inputs have contaminated lake sediments and some tributaries; there are many high-ecological-quality streams, but nutrient levels are poor; high level of riparian fencing on dairy farms; Ngahewa has degraded water quality.
9 of 9



Shallow riverine lakes have algal blooms, very poor clarity, pest fish, have lost submerged plants, and kai species are degraded. Rehabilitation plans initiated.
1 of 4
Lake Rotoroa’s ecological integrity and water quality have degraded.
2 of 4




The water clarity degrades swimming all year, but bug-level safe in the bathing season; diverse native fish (whitebait & eel fishing), but pest fish are prevalent; extensive drainage and flood control degrade ecological integrity; large wetlands present.
1 of 5 Waipā

Water quality and clarity are unsafe for swimming in the mainstem and many tributaries; many lakes have good access and riparian vegetation but low water quality; diverse kai species in tributaries.
2 of 5 Mid Waikato

Water quality is safe for swimming only in the mainstem in bathing season; macroinvertebrate indicators reflect degraded conditions; good access and signage on mainstem and lake, efforts underway to improve fish passage.
3 of 5 Ohakuri To Karapiro

Water quality is safe for swimming in the mainstem but not in most tributaries; six hydrolakes with good access support recreation; cumulative effects of farm inputs are increasing; a high degree of groundwater allocation; eels are manually transferred from below Karapiro; a high level of riparian fencing on dairy farms.
4 of 5 Huka To Ohakuri

Water quality is safe for swimming and good for trout fishing; geothermal inputs have contaminated lake sediments and some tributaries; there are many high-ecological-quality streams, but nutrient levels are poor; high level of riparian fencing on dairy farms; Ngahewa has degraded water quality.
5 of 5